noworldsystem.com


De-Facto One Child Policy Urged in Australia

De-Facto One Child Policy Urged in Australia

AAP
December 10, 2007


COUPLES who have more than two children should be charged a lifelong tax to offset their extra offspring’s carbon dioxide emissions, a medical expert says.

The report in an Australian medical journal called for parents to be charged $5000 a head for every child after their second, and an annual tax of up to $800.

And couples who were sterilised would be eligible for carbon credits under the controversial proposal.

Perth specialist Professor Barry Walters was heavily critical of the $4000 baby bonus, saying that paying new parents extra for every baby fuelled more children, more emissions and “greenhouse-unfriendly behaviour”.

Instead, it should be replaced with a “baby levy” in the form of a carbon tax in line with the “polluter pays” principle, he wrote in the latest Medical Journal of Australia.

“Every family choosing to have more than a defined number of children should be charged a carbon tax that would fund the planting of enough trees to offset the carbon cost generated by a new human being,” said Prof Walters, an obstetrician at King Edward Memorial Hospital.

Sustainable Population Australia suggested a maximum of two, he said.

By the same reasoning, contraceptives like diaphragms and condoms, as well as sterilisation procedures, should attract carbon credits, the specialist said.

Read Full Article Here

Global Warming Hoax News Archive

 



Ron Paul Univision Debate Highlights

Ron Paul Univision Debate Highlights

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLOUHWlZsqU

 



Ron Paul Mentions 20/20 Host as Possible Appointee

Ron Paul Mentions 20/20’s John Stossel as Possible Administration Appointees

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1slo0cGKAYc

 

War on Drugs – John Stossel interviews Ron Paul

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpgWAAmVwDM

 

Ron Paul Newsweek Segment About the I.R.S.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5tgVJiXRjw

Ron Paul Administration Appointments
http://www.nolanchart.com/article421.html

Well known Ron Paul Supporter gets arrested for jaywalking
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmPi2GbbUes

Diverse crowd turns out for Paul event
http://www.star-telegram.com/elections/story/349903.html

Kansas Republican Caucus & Straw Poll. Ron Paul wins. By how much? 79-0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMCgPsbwJsI

The shocking truth about Ron Paul
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OO1sw2Qf1Kc

Live Free or Die Volunteers come from afar for GOP’s Ron Paul
http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/p…1209/NEWS/712090352

A Ron Paul Grassroots Group Formed A PAC And Is Running TV Ads For Him In Iowa. The Ads Are Amazing
http://mparent7777-2.blogspot.com/….oots-group-formed-pac.html

Why the Internet Community Supports Ron Paul
http://www.nolanchart.com/article414.html

Race for ‘08: Ron Paul fans share one goal – Cut government
http://www.sacbee.com/111/story/553861.html

Ron Paul and the Media Bias
http://www.nolanchart.com/article411.html

 



Mandatory Flu Vaccines For Preschoolers

Mandatory Flu Vaccines For Preschoolers

NY Times
December 9, 2007

The New Jersey Public Health Council is expected to vote tomorrow on a rule that would require flu vaccines for any child entering day care or preschool. If it is approved, New Jersey would become the first state in the country to impose that mandate.

The flu vaccine is one of four that the council will consider. There is a vaccine that would be given to children entering day care or preschool to protect against pneumonia, and two others that would be given to those entering sixth grade: one to guard against meningococcal disease, a fast-killing strain of meningitis, and the other an additional booster of a three-part shot already administered at a younger age against tetanus, pertussis and diphtheria.

Read Full Article Here

Merck Vaccine Brings AIDS to America
http://noworldsystem.com/2007/12/05/merck-vaccine-brings-aids-to-america/

Financial Interests In Coerced Vaccinations
http://www.newstarget.com/022280.html

Major U.S. Airports Offering Flu Shots
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071206/ap_on_re_us/airport_flu_shots

Deadly Vaccine News Archive

 



Child Prisoners in Iraq Suffering Same Abuse as Adults
December 10, 2007, 2:04 pm
Filed under: Abu Ghraib, Child Abuse, Detainee, George Bush, Iraq, Oppression, Torture, UN, White House

Child Prisoners in Iraq Suffering Same Abuse as Adults

uruknet.info
December 8, 2007

The existence of minors imprisoned in some Iraqi jails was recently confirmed through IRIN, a project of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.

It was known a priori that brutal executions and a thousand forms of horrifying violence would accompany the «democratic» crusade of George W. Bush in Iraq.
I’m not only referring to the startling images that appeared a couple years ago, showing prisoners tortured and humiliated in Abu Ghraib by members of the US armed forces; nor am I alluding to the no less atrocious bombings and cutting down of civilian populations by the occupation armies.

I’m speaking of a form of abuse worse than those on the long list of violations committed during America’s intervention: the imprisoment of children. The UN’s Integrated Regional Information Networks, commonly known as the IRIN news agency, recently confirmed the existence of minors imprisoned in some Iraqi jails.
«They are treated as adults» and subjected to «abuse and torture» during interrogations, reported the news agency.

The investigations began after several families went to a humanitarian organization, Association for Justice for Prisoners (AJP), seeking psychological assistance for their children who had just been released from jail.

This case involved five minors, between the ages of 13 and 17, who were detained during operations of the Iraqi army in the Baghdad neighborhoods of Adhamiya, Latifiya, Alawi, Dura and Hay al Adel. They were held under the charges of supporting the insurgency.

«The five children showed signs of torture on their bodies. Three of them had cigarette burns on their legs and one could not speak because the shock sessions had affected his capacity for conversation,» parents bemoaned.

Torture and Abuse

As specified by international law, children that have been arrested should remain in that situation for the shortest possible time, held in a special place separate from adults, and receive special treatment. However, these pacts —we know— only serve to file files in the White House – not to be put into practice or complied with.

Despite the fact that the Interior Ministry of the Mesopotamian country and the occupation army deny these accusations —saying that minors who are held for interrogation are released within 48 hours, without suffering abuse or torture— IRIN affirms that children have remained in prison more than two years, and are mixed in with the adult population.

High-ranking officials of the Iraqi Interior Ministry communicated anonymously to IRIN saying that in each Iraqi jail there are at least 220 children and that they all have been abused.
AJP reported that it has informants in the prisons, but since the organization refuses to release their names, it is impossible to prove the alleged abuses. IRIN has requested permission to visit the prisons where minors are said to be held, but its request has —of course— been rejected.

AJP spokesperson Jalid Rabiaa said that weekly, at least two children and their parents come to his office in search of help. «This is not a political game; they’re young and it’s necessary to respect their rights.» «They are trying to hide the truth, but the reality is that they are there and they need special help before and after their release,» he added.

 



Pelosi did not object to waterboarding in 2002

Secretly briefed, Pelosi did not object to waterboarding in 2002
Pelosi would later boot sole objector to program from chance to chair Intelligence Committee

Raw Story
December 9, 2007

Two senior Republicans and Democrats in Congress — including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi — were briefing on the CIA’s program to use waterboarding on terror suspects in September 2002 and did not object, according to Sunday’s Washington Post.

In the long-ranging article, which seemingly takes the lawmakers and the Bush Administration to task by discussing the practice’s emergence in Nazi Germany and other totalitarian states, a Pelosi aide said the Speaker remembered discussion of “enhanced” interrogation techniques and “acknowledged that Pelosi did not raise objections at the time.”

“In September 2002, four members of Congress met in secret for a first look at a unique CIA program designed to wring vital information from reticent terrorism suspects in U.S. custody,” the Post wrote. “For more than an hour, the bipartisan group, which included current House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), was given a virtual tour of the CIA’s overseas detention sites and the harsh techniques interrogators had devised to try to make their prisoners talk.”

“Among the techniques described, said two officials present, was waterboarding, a practice that years later would be condemned as torture by Democrats and some Republicans on Capitol Hill,” the Post added. “But on that day, no objections were raised. Instead, at least two lawmakers in the room asked the CIA to push harder, two U.S. officials said.”

Read Full Article Here

 



CIA’s Destroyed Torture Tapes and the Saudi-Pakistani 9/11 Connection

Destroyed CIA torture tapes said to implicate Pakistan and Saudi Royal Family in 9/11 attacks

Huffington Post
December 7, 2007

On December 5, the CIA’s director, General Michael V. Hayden, issued a statement disclosing that in 2005 at least two videotapes of interrogations with al Qaeda prisoners were destroyed. The tapes, which the CIA did not provide to either the 9/11 Commission, nor to a federal court in the case of Zacarias Moussaoui, were destroyed, claimed Hayden, to protect the safety of undercover operatives.

Hayden did not disclose one of the al Qaeda suspects whose tapes were destroyed. But he did identify the other. It was Abu Zubaydah, the top ranking terror suspect when he was tracked and captured in Pakistan in 2003. In September 2006, at a press conference in which he defended American interrogation techniques, President Bush also mentioned Abu Zubaydah by name. Bush acknowledged that Zubaydah, who was wounded when captured, did not initially cooperate with his interrogators, but that eventually when he did talk, his information was, according to Bush, “quite important.”

In my 2003 New York Times bestseller, Why America Slept: The Failure to Prevent 9/11, I discussed Abu Zubaydah at length in Chapter 19, “The Interrogation.” There I set forth how Zubaydah initially refused to help his American captors. Also, disclosed was how U.S. intelligence established a so-called “fake flag” operation, in which the wounded Zubaydah was transferred to Afghanistan under the ruse that he had actually been turned over to the Saudis. The Saudis had him on a wanted list, and the Americans believed that Zubaydah, fearful of torture and death at the hands of the Saudis, would start talking when confronted by U.S. agents playing the role of Saudi intelligence officers.

Instead, when confronted by his “Saudi” interrogators, Zubaydah showed no fear. Instead, according to the two U.S. intelligence sources that provided me the details, he seemed relieved. The man who had been reluctant to even confirm his identity to his U.S. captors, suddenly talked animatedly. He was happy to see them, he said, because he feared the Americans would kill him. He then asked his interrogators to call a senior member of the Saudi royal family. And Zubaydah provided a private home number and a cell phone number from memory. “He will tell you what to do,” Zubaydah assured them

That man was Prince Ahmed bin Salman bin Abdul-Aziz, one of King Fahd’s nephews, and the chairman of the largest Saudi publishing empire. Later, American investigators would determine that Prince Ahmed had been in the U.S. on 9/11.

American interrogators used painkillers to induce Zubaydah to talk — they gave him the meds when he cooperated, and withdrew them when he was quiet. They also utilized a thiopental sodium drip (a so-called truth serum). Several hours after he first fingered Prince Ahmed, his captors challenged the information, and said that since he had disparaged the Saudi royal family, he would be executed. It was at that point that some of the secrets of 9/11 came pouring out. In a short monologue, that one investigator told me was the “Rosetta Stone” of 9/11, Zubaydah laid out details of how he and the al Qaeda hierarchy had been supported at high levels inside the Saudi and Pakistan governments.

He named two other Saudi princes, and also the chief of Pakistan’s air force, as his major contacts. Moreover, he stunned his interrogators, by charging that two of the men, the King’s nephew, and the Pakistani Air Force chief, knew a major terror operation was planned for America on 9/11.

It would be nice to further investigate the men named by Zubaydah, but that is not possible. All four identified by Zubaydah are now dead. As for the three Saudi princes, the King’s 43-year-old nephew, Prince Ahmed, died of either a heart attack or blood clot, depending on which report you believe, after having liposuction in Riyadh’s top hospital; the second, 41-year-old Prince Sultan bin Faisal bin Turki al-Saud, died the following day in a one car accident, on his way to the funeral of Prince Ahmed; and one week later, the third Saudi prince named by Zubaydah, 25-year-old Prince Fahd bin Turki bin Saud al-Kabir, died, according to the Saudi Royal Court, “of thirst.” The head of Pakistan’s Air Force, Mushaf Ali Mir, was the last to go. He died, together with his wife and fifteen of his top aides, when his plane blew up — suspected as sabotage — in February 2003. Pakistan’s investigation of the explosion — if one was even done — has never been made public.

Zubaydah is the only top al Queda operative who has secretly linked two of America’s closest allies in the war on terror — Saudi Arabia and Pakistan — to the 9/11 attacks. Why does Bush, and the CIA, continue to protect the Saudi Royal family and the Pakistani military, from the implications of Zubaydah’s confessions? It is, or course, because the Bush administration desperately needs Pakistani and Saudi help, not only to keep Afghanistan from spinning completely out of control, but also as counterweights to the growing power of Iran. The Sunni governments in Riyadh and Islamabad have as much to fear from a resurgent Iran as does the Bush administration. But does this mean that leads about the origins of 9/11 should not be aggressively pursued? Of course not. But this is precisely what the Bush administration is doing. And now the cover-up is enhanced by the CIA’s destruction of Zubaydah’s interrogation tapes.

The American public deserves no less than the complete truth about 9/11. And those CIA officials now complicit in hiding the truth by destroying key evidence should be held responsible.

Related News:

Man Held By CIA Says He Was Tortured
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/09/washin…./hArvvL67u7/dpvA

McCain: No Investigation Needed
http://politicalinquirer.com/2007/1…stigation-needed/

Congress Looks Into C.I.A. Obstruction As Calls for Justice Inquiry Rise
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/08/washi….Uioe%2BjiIYg

‘Well-Informed’ Source Tells CBS That Tapes Were Destroyed To Prevent Prosecution
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/08/cbs-source-tapes/

Lee Hamilton Says the CIA Obstructed the 9/11 Commission
http://www.911blogger.com/node/12894

Inquiry into CIA interrogation tapes’ destruction begins
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Inquiry_…s_1208.html

CIA destroyed video of ‘waterboarding’ al-Qaida detainees
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,2223738,00.html

C.I.A. Destroyed Tapes of Interrogations
C.I.A. Destroyed 2 Tapes Showing Interrogations
CIA admits destroying interrogation tapes

 



Callers on C-SPAN

Callers on C-SPAN – (12/09/2007)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQ8CeINmJ-k

 



Gore Profiting Off Of Green Speeches
December 10, 2007, 8:16 am
Filed under: Al Gore, Co2, Global Warming, Hoax, carbon dioxide

Gore Profiting Off Of Green Speeches

Daily Paul
December 9, 2007

Al Gore has come under fire for making personal gain from his mission to save the planet – after charging £3,300 a minute to deliver a poorly received speech.

The former American Vice-President was also accused of being “precious” at the London event, demanding his own VIP room and ejecting journalists, despite hopes the star-studded gathering would generate publicity for the fight against global warming.

Many of the audience at last month’s Fortune Forum summit were restless as Mr Gore, who has won both a Nobel Peace Prize and an Oscar for his campaigning work this year, delivered the half-hour speech that netted him £100,000.

Read Full Article Here

Report: Gore poorly received in London
http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Top_N….d_in_london/2540/

Global Warming Hoax News Archive