Filed under: 2008 Election, 9/11, Alex Jones, Barack Obama, Black Box Voting, CNN, Diebold, Hillary Clinton, John McCain, LHS, New Hampshire, Ron Paul, Ron Paul Banned, Ron Paul Exclusions, Rudy Giuliani, bev harris, election fraud, mitt tomney, new hampshire district, new hampshire primaries, premier, rasmussen, super tuesday, sutton, vote scam, voter fraud
New Hampshire District ADMITS Ron Paul Votes Not Counted
Sutton township reported Congressman had zero votes, actual number was 31
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
January 9, 2008
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBfmksI_wYY
The head clerk of the New Hampshire town of Sutton has been forced to admit that Ron Paul received 31 votes yet when the final amount was transferred to a summary sheet and sent out to the media, the total was listed as zero. The fiasco throws the entire primary into doubt and could lead to a re-count.
As we reported earlier today, an entire family voted for Ron Paul in Sutton, yet when the voting map on the Politico website was posted, the total votes for Ron Paul were zero.
Vote fraud expert Bev Harris contacted the head clerk in Sutton, Jennifer Call, who was forced to admit that the 31 votes Ron Paul received were completely omitted from the final report sheet, claiming “human error” was responsible for the mistake.
Two or three votes not counted could be a plausible mistake – but 31 votes for one candidate?
“The classic method for rigging a hand count is to write the wrong number on the form,” Harris told the Alex Jones Show.
“They are counting everything in public real nice, they fill out a form in public real nice and then they transfer it to another form and they call that a summary sheet and then that is the one they send in,” explained Harris.
“What happened is she said they did not transfer the number correctly and put zero instead of 31 – that is unacceptable as an answer.”
With 100% of precincts now reporting, the map originally listed zero votes for Ron Paul as you can see below. It has now been updated to reflect the 31 votes Paul actually received.
The remainder of the 31 people in Sutton who voted for Ron Paul need to go public immediately with the charge of vote fraud and make it known that they were cheated out of their right to vote.
Harris estimates that it could cost the Ron Paul campaign as much as $67,000 dollars for a recount, but such a move could throw the entire primary into doubt, especially in light of the fact that Barack Obama appears to have been cheated out of a win by Hillary Clinton.
Clear Evidence Of Widespread Vote Fraud In New Hampshire
Paul and Obama cheated out of 3rd and 1st by voting machines, hand count fraud
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
January 9, 2008
There were several major vote fraud issues to arise out of the New Hampshire primary revolving mainly around Ron Paul and Barack Obama, who were both seemingly cheated out of third and first places respectively as a result of rigged Diebold voting machines and deliberate malfeasance in the counting of hand-written paper ballots.
- Obama had a 13 to 15 point lead over Hillary Clinton heading into the primary. Nothing occured that boosted Hillary’s numbers immediately before the election, in fact immediately after the staged crying incident, many pundits argued it could only have harmed her chances. And yet Hillary somehow managed to instigate a near 20 point swing to defeat Obama by three per cent. If not for her 7% swing as a result of Diebold voting machines, Hillary would have lost to Obama. If Obama was struggling he would probably contest this bizarre outcome, but he is likely to accept the results simply to save face.
- The New Hampshire town of Sutton admits that it voided every vote Ron Paul received. The Congressman got 31 votes and yet due to a “human error,” Sutton reported zero votes for Ron Paul. How “human error” can explain not counting 31 votes in succession for one single candidate is beyond the pale and Ron Paul’s campaign should ask for a recount across New Hampshire immediately.
- As soon as people went public with the fact that their votes in Sutton had not been counted, other districts where Paul had supposedly received zero votes, such as Greenville, suddenly changed their final tallies and attributed votes to the Congressman.
- Going into New Hampshire Ron Paul was polling in the early teens and was a strong bet to take third place behind McCain and Romney. Four days before the vote, Rasmussen had Paul at 14% – a significant lead over Huckabee on 11% and Giuliani on 8% – and yet Ron Paul finished with just 8%. Proof of clear vote fraud, allied with the fact that Paul’s numbers show a 6% swing from normally accurate pre-polling forecasts, clearly indicate chicanery was at hand, especially considering the fact that Paul lost those crucial few percentage points to Giuliani as a reuslt of electronic Diebold voting machines which are known to be wide open to tampering and fraud.
- Going purely on hand-counts, which as we saw in Sutton were by no means angelic but at least harder to cheat on than Diebold voting machines without getting caught, Ron Paul would have won 15% of the vote and finished third. This figure would have more accurately correlated to the pre-primary polls rather than the ridiculous 8% he was eventually given.
- Numerous districts reported totals of anything up to 22% for “other candidates”. What on earth does this black hole of “other candidates” mean? How can one vote for a candidate that is not on the ballot without spoiling the ballot paper? The district of Lisbon reported 22.5% votes for this mysterious “other” candidate, while in the large district of Londonderry, the “other” candidate received 10%. Many are now alleging that these “other” votes were merely siphoned from Ron Paul to keep his final number low.
- Rudy Giuliani, the 9/11 candidate who beat Ron Paul thanks to the aid of a 3% swing on Diebold voting machines, received 9.11% of the vote in three different towns. Coincidence or somebody’s idea of a sick joke?
Protect Ron Paul from Vote Fraud
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQxB5VKWlfg
CNN Mentions Possibility Of Vote Fraud
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcwdKBVt_Ew
Is this Fraud??
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qV6qAGigGYY
Related News:
Will Ron Paul authorize an audit of the New Hampshire primary?
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd335.htm
Clear Evidence Of Widespread Vote Fraud In New Hampshire
http://www.prisonplanet.com..08/011008_clinton_fraud.htm
NH Hand Count Results Show Vote Fraud
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/23643
Ron Paul Votes Not Counted In New Hampshire District
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/january2008/010908_not_counted.htm
Clinton Received a 4.5% Boost In “Diebold” Towns
http://benmoseley.blogspot.com/20..how-election.html
Greenville Vote Discrepancy SAME as Sutton
http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=754
Diebold says Hillary won NH, hand count says Obama
http://presscue.com/node/38034
Results: Precincts where Ron Paul had 0-386 votes total
http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=686
NH Primary: Pre-Election Polls Wildly Different Than Results Announced for Clinton/Obama
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5530
NH debacle: BBC wants to hear from you NOW!
http://mparent7777-2.blogs..exit-polls.htmlc4252478287468633249
Giuliani gets 9.11% of the vote in three towns?
http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=764
Paul Not Swayed By Fifth Place
http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/a..9/NEWS08/149590144/-1/news08
Paul hopes cash gets him to Super Tuesday
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/nation/5439272.html
New Hampshire Primary – ALL Diebold, ALL the Time
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0801/S00057.htm
Ron Paul Statement on The New Republic Smear Regarding Racist Newsletters
http://mparent7777-2.blogspot.com/200..ent-on-new-republic.html
Ron Paul Teaches Laura Ingraham A Few Badly Needed Lessons
Did Diebold rig New Hampshire?
Ron Paul On CNN During New Hampshire Primary
West Virginia Sticks With Electronic Voting Machines
Ron Paul: Vote Fraud Victim
How Big Corporations Choose ‘Your’ Candidates
Filed under: 2008 Election, Daily Show, Fox News Debate, New Hampshire, Republican Debate, Ron Paul, Rudy Giuliani, jon stewart, new hampshire primaries
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 Families, 9/11 Firefighters, 9/11 Truth, 9/11 workers, 93 bombing, Ground Zero, New York, Rudy Giuliani, World Trade Center, scandal
Giuliani: New York City Survived 9/11 Attacks Because Of Me
Think Progress
January 9, 2008
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StE_Xa6TiQU
In a Wall Street Journal op-ed today on homeland security, Rudy Giuliani references September 11 nine separate times. In one of those instances, he claims he prepared New York City well to “withstand the 9/11 attack“:
One reason New York City was able to withstand the 9/11 attack was that we were prepared to meet 21st-century security threats. … And while we didn’t anticipate the specific scenario of 9/11, the constant practice, and the relentless follow-up from actual emergencies, certainly helped in its aftermath.
Jim Riches, a deputy New York City fire chief who lost a son at the Trade Center, has a very different perspective:
“Lives were lost because of the lack of preparation and (Giuliani’s) lack of leadership,” said Riches, who spent 16 days in a coma after the attacks due to respiratory failure. “All he did was run that day, and get on TV and provide a calming influence for the United States of America. And they made him a hero.”
Because of Giuliani’s failures, first responders were forced to use old radio equipment on 9/11 that prevented them from hearing evacuation orders when the World Trade Center buildings were about to collapse. The radios had malfunctioned eight years earlier, during the 1993 attacks on the WTC.
Giuliani claimed last month, “It would have been impossible for me to have those radios ready.” It would not have been impossible. After the 1993 incident, Giuliani gave Motorola a $14-million no-bid contract to produce faulty radios that had to be taken out of service in March 2001. Brave New Films released this web video detailing the negative impact Giuliani’s no-bid decision had on firefighters on 9/11.
http://www.huffingtonpost.co..onfr_n_79917.html
Filed under: 2008 Election, 9/11, 9/11 Truth, 9/11 whistleblowers, False Flag, Fox News, Fox News Debate, New Hampshire, Ron Paul, We Are Change, inside job, jack blood, meet the press, neocons, new hampshire primaries, republican primaries, tim russert
Filed under: Amero, CAFTA, CFR, Condoleezza Rice, Congress, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Globalism, Honduras, Illegal Immigration, Mexican Trucks, Mexico, NAFTA, NAFTA Superhighway, New World Order, Nicaragua, North American Union, Peru, TTC, Vicente Fox, columbia, european union, global elite, guatemala, i-35, panama, single currency
U.S. Plans Outline a Subsidized Pan-American Highway
Jones Report
January 8, 2008
U.S. Title Code TITLE 23 > CHAPTER 2 > § 212 provides for the construction and maintenance of the Inter-American Highway program in cooperation with the Governments of the American Republics in Central America (i.e. Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama).
“Title 23 of the US Code as currently published by the US Government reflects the laws passed by Congress as of Jan. 2, 2006.”
Under the code, the United States essentially pays for up to one-third of the total construction costs (depending on each nation’s wealth):
(a) Not to exceed one-third of the appropriation authorized for each fiscal year may be expended without requiring the country or countries in which such funds may be expended to match any part thereof, if the Secretary of State shall find that the cost of constructing said highway in such country or countries will be beyond their reasonable capacity to bear.
The U.S. also agrees to provide all the maintenance costs:
(5) will provide for the maintenance of said highway after its completion in condition adequately to serve the needs of present and future traffic.
The U.S. has cooperated with Latin America on highway systems since the first Pan American Highway Congress in Buenos Aires in 1925, but footing all the costs for infrastructure can’t be a good sign for expanded globalization to come.
This acceleration of hemispheric-consolidation only correlates with the passage CAFTA in the Central American States and the passage of ‘free trade’ agreements with Panama, Peru and Columbia during 2007. Further, Condoleezza Rice and President Bush have hailed the significant steps towards the broader ‘vision’ of a Pan-American Community.
“The founding ideal of our Pan-American Community, borne across many centuries and carried by us still, is the hope that life in the hemisphere would signify a break with the Old World, and a new beginning for all mankind,” Secretary Rice told the C.F.R. and the Organization of American States in October 2007.
“We now have the potential to create an unbroken chain of trading partners from Tierra del Fuego to the Arctic Circle,” Rice said to the OAS.
Vicente Fox has also advocated not only the North American Union, but hinted at a unified currency throughout the Americas sometime in the future during an appearance on Larry King Live.
An unbroken chain of trading partners– under ever-expanding ‘free trade’ blocs (yes, an oxymoron)– would certainly go hand-in-hand with an inter-connected, well-maintained highway– but subsidizing the expenses is no route to equal or independent nations inside a community, but rather a formula for guaranteeing centralized regional control.
That’s not to say that free travel and reasonably safe and convenient travel is not a worthwhile goal, but certainly many are concerned about the implications such a smaller hemisphere would mean for employment and wages. Even Mexican farmers are now protesting free trade, illegal immigration and the effects of NAFTA, a position American farmers likely never steered from.
Meanwhile, Mexico has already announced its intention to microchip migrant workers coming from Central and South America and other places.
L. Ronald Scheman, founder of the Pan American Development foundation and Senior Advisor to Kissinger McLarty Associates proposes that opportunities to harmonize the Americas can lead to long-term integration along the same route taken by the E.U.– early on, the E.U. was nothing more than a Coal and Steel Community which eventually solidified unification:
“To him, the strategy was clear. ‘This proposal [for a coal and steel community] has an essential political objective: to make a breach in the ramparts of national sovereignty, which will be narrow enough to secure consent — but deep enough to open the way toward the unity that is essential to peace [and we might add, for our purposes in the Americas, for development].’”
http://www.jonesreport.com/article/01_08/090108_ttc_conspiracy.html
NAFTA Jeopardizes Mexican Sugar Industry
http://www.plenglish.com/Article.asp?…EFD4%7D&language=EN
White House OKs Mexican Truck Program
http://www.rawstory.com/news/moc…_truck_progr_01042008.html
Filed under: 2nd Amendment, Congress, George Bush, Gun Control, NRA, US Constitution, Veterans Disarmament Act, anti gun, brady bill, mental health screening, veterans, virginia tech
Bush Kills Second Amendment for Veterans
LA Times
January 9, 2008
A rare piece of gun legislation finds the National Rifle Association and the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence on the same side, and President Bush signed such a bill Tuesday.
The measure, Congress’ response to last year’s Virginia Tech shootings, is the first significant federal legislation in years aimed at tightening gun laws. It seeks to expand the federal database used to screen gun buyers to include the estimated 2 million-plus people, including felons and mentally ill individuals, who are ineligible to buy firearms.
Filed under: Alan Greenspan, Credit Crisis, DEBT, Economic Collapse, Economy, Federal Reserve, Goldman Sachs, Great Depression, Greenback, Inflation, Lehman Brothers, Martin Feldstein, Merrill Lynch, Stock Market, US Economy, US Treasury, economic depression, interest rate cuts, jim rogers, rate cut
Goldman Sachs sees recession in 2008
Reuters
January 9, 2008
Goldman Sachs on Wednesday said it expects the U.S. economy to drop into recession this year, prompting the Federal Reserve to slash benchmark lending rates to 2.5 percent by the third quarter.
In a note to clients, Goldman said real gross domestic product would contract by 1 percent on an annualized basis in both the second and third quarters. For all of 2008, the investment bank said GDP would rise by 0.8 percent.
The unemployment rate will rise to 6.5 percent in 2009 from the current 5 percent, it said.
The weakening economy will force the Fed to lower policy rates by an additional 1.75 percentage points from the current 4.25 percent. Starting in September, the Fed cut rates at the last three meetings of the Federal Open Market Committee, reducing the target rate on loans between banks by 1 percentage point from 5.25 percent.
Merrill Lynch: Recession “Has Arrived”
BBC
January 8, 2008
The feared recession in the US economy has already arrived, according to a report from Merrill Lynch.
It said that Friday’s employment report, which sent shares tumbling worldwide, confirmed that the US is in the first month of a recession.
Its view is controversial, with banks such as Lehman Brothers disagreeing.
An official ruling on whether the US is in recession is made by the National Bureau of Economic Research, but this decision may not come for two years.
The NBER defines a recession as “a significant decline in economic activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months”.
It bases its assessment on final figures on employment, personal income, industrial production and sales activity in the manufacturing and retail sectors.
Merrill Lynch said that the figures showing the jobless rate hitting 5% in December were the final piece in that puzzle.
“According to our analysis, this isn’t even a forecast any more but is a present day reality,” the report said.
It added that the current consensus view on Wall Street that there is a good chance of avoiding a recession is “in denial”.
It also objected to the use of euphemistic terms for the state of the economy.
“To say that the backdrop is ‘recession like’ is akin to an obstetrician telling a woman that she is ‘sort of pregnant’,” the report said.
National Bureau of Economic Research: “Odds Of Recession More Than 50%”
Bloomberg
January 7, 2008
Harvard University economist Martin Feldstein, head of the group that dates U.S. economic cycles, said the odds of a recession have risen to more than 50 percent after a report showing unemployment jumped in December.
“We are now talking about more likely than not,” Feldstein, president of the National Bureau of Economic Research, said in an interview in New Orleans two days ago. “I have been saying about 50 percent. This now pushes it up a bit above that.”
The jobless rate rose to 5 percent in December, the highest in two years, from 4.7 percent in November, a government report showed last week. Payrolls rose by 18,000, the least since August 2003.
The U.S. economic expansion is cooling after a third- quarter surge as the housing slump enters its third year and consumer spending slows. Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan and ex-Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers are among those raising the prospect of a recession.
The increase in unemployment will hurt consumer confidence, Feldstein said in the interview. He was in New Orleans to speak at an economics panel discussion on productivity that was part of the annual meeting of the Allied Social Science Associations.
“Consumers, with essentially no growth in jobs in December, are going to be more nervous about the future,” said Feldstein, 68. “They are going to be a little more reluctant to spend, and that is going to put a further drag on growth in 2008.”
Jim Rogers Says U.S. to Have Worst Recession `in a While’
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/..sid=ayq29JCsf65c&refer=home
