Filed under: Abu Ghraib, Afghanistan, Britain, Child Abuse, Detainees, Dick Cheney, Europe, Extraordinary Rendition, Geneva Convention, Guantanamo, Habeas Corpus, Iraq, Oppression, Torture, US Constitution, United Kingdom, War Crimes, War On Terror, civil liberties, civil rights, enemy combatant, european union, nation building, neocons, occupation, rendition, waterboarding
Neocon gets waterboarded; agrees that it’s torture
The Guardian
July 2, 2008
Late last year, the writer, polemicist and fierce proponent of the US-led invasion of Iraq Christopher Hitchens attempted, in a piece for the online magazine Slate, to draw a distinction between what he called techniques of “extreme interrogation” and “outright torture”.
From this, his foes inferred that since it was Hitchens’ belief that America did not stoop to the latter, the practice of waterboarding – known to be perpetrated by US forces against certain “high-value clients” in Iraq and elsewhere – must fall under the former heading.
Enraged by what they saw as an exercise in elegant but offensive sophistry, some of the writer’s critics suggested that Hitchens give waterboarding (which may sound like some kind of fun aquatic pastime, but is probably best summarised as enforced partial drowning) a whirl, just to see what it was like. Did the experience feel like torture.
Leave a Comment so far
Leave a comment
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
