Filed under: 1st amendment, Communism, Dictatorship, Empire, Fascism, Globalism, Internet 2, NWO, Nazi, New World Order, US Constitution, european union, free speech, global government, internet, internet blackout, internet censorship, internet manipulation, socialism, world government | Tags: GAC, Governmental Advisory Committee
Internet moves towards Global Government
EU Observer
October 1, 2009
The body responsible for managing the development of the internet, Icann, has cut its umbilical cord to the US government, a move the European Union has been demanding for four years.
The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, which oversees domain names – the .com, .eu, .org and so on at the end of a web address – as of 30 September will no longer be subject to review by the US Department of Commerce.
Instead, independent review panels appointed by Icann Governmental Advisory Committee (Gac) and Icann itself with the involvement of governments around the world. will perform this task.
Since 2005, the EU has been calling for reform of the governance of the internet, saying that the internet is a global resource and should not be tied to one national government – a position echoed by many other countries and a number of companies.
2 Comments so far
Leave a comment
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
[...] records, an international gun-control treaty, an international criminal court treaty, the internet moving towards world government it’s crystal clear what is about to happen in this [...]
Pingback by Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty? « Get d'Clu October 18, 2009 @ 6:21 amThe New World Order and a Network of Spies
http://www.blogcatalog.com/search.frame.php?term=european+security+and+defence+policy&id=5c5693b0b60574868b46228646bff017
“….Another EUISS document (July 2009), What Ambitions for European Defence 2020 covers long term EU security strategy, including the problems of “hierarchical class society”, with the “elite” of the world on one side, and the rest of the world on the other. To avoid “global systemic collapse”, the document suggests that the “full spectrum of high intensity combat” be used to protect what is called “globalisers” from “localisers”. The paper elaborates on “barrier operations shielding the global rich from the tensions and problems of the poor”. It states that “as the ratio of the world population living in misery and frustration will remain massive, the tensions and spillover between their world and that of the rich will continue to grow. As we are unlikely to have solved this problem at its root by 2020 – i.e. by curing dysfunctional societies, we will need to strengthen our barriers. It is a morally distasteful, losing strategy, but will be unavoidable if we cannot solve the problems at their root.”
The EU document Internet of Things (IoT) states that:
Comment by Iain Sumage October 19, 2009 @ 9:32 am“Simply leaving the development of IoT to the private sector, and possibly to other world regions is not a sensible option in view of the deep societal changes that IoT will bring about. Many of these changes will have to be addressed by European policy-makers and public authorities……”